This was photographed tonight.
It’s his first game…
2nd time at bat, and…
very first hit…
ever.
—Peter.
Technical: Shot through a chain-link fence @ f/1.4 with focus on his near eye. ISO 640. 1/3000.
This is a second test shot with the Leica 35/2 v1 (8 element), this time on the M3.
Please forgive the repetitive nature of these test images, but it is important for me to observe the behaviour of different equipment under similar circumstances.
On a related note, I’ve pretty much decided to abandon film (again)… there are more and more obstacles making it difficult for me to continue working with it.
—Peter.
Another window light portrait, in front of my “famous” window.
However…
–
…this time I offer a twist on an old theme: this image was taken with a recently acquired (and adjusted, in Japan) Leica 35mm Summicron (8 element) lens, otherwise known as Version 1 of the legendary 35mm Summicron. My lens was made in Germany in the early 60s. It’s an example of the relatively less common screw mount (LTM) version, but mine was subsequently converted to M mount by Leica.
The lens arrived today. I mounted it on my Leica M9P and fired off the above “test” shot, wide open at f/2.
Here’s what the lens looks like:
–
–
It’s tiny, light, and another jewel in the Leica crown.
—Peter.
I’ve re-instated the gear categories beside each post.
Don’t say I never gave you anything for Easter.
—Peter.
And I leave you with one question: Why would you pixel-peep a film photograph?
(we don’t do that for a painting, even though an iPhone can “out-resolve” it)
—Peter.
I shot a second roll of Kodak Portra 400 on my Mamiya 7II last week.
Why haven’t I posted any photographs?
The lab accidentally exposed the film to light. Every image was lost.
Today, I dropped off more film. I’d taken some casual shots from a family event this weekend. I was told that the processing machine was down. Apparently this is a rare occurrence.
There’s no time estimate for when I’ll get my film back.
—Peter.
So I made a few decisions today. And then I ate a granola bar.
(if you care to understand, see my previous comments)
—Peter.
My promise to you — as part of your free membership to this site — is that I’ll continue to work hard to stretch your zero dollars.
So from now on, I will not only be doing my best to answer your questions, but I’ll also be sharing my famous home-made pizza dough with you, the viewer, via iPhone images.
That’s right, images of my very own home-made pizza dough shared with you — online.
While other Canadian photo-bloggers claim to provide you with value for your hard-earned zero dollars, I’m the only Canadian photo-blogger sharing authentic home-made pizza dough with you.
And what is better than home made pizza (dough)?
That’s my promise.
—Peter.
I say the silliest things to her…
On another note, the artificial and mixed back-lighting, and the reflections off the red walls, in this scene are very challenging. Yet, with the proper pre-processing (a term I believe I coined) and post-processing, the technical issues are mostly overcome.
I know that there will be a few individuals who will insist that I should have used flash, but I vehemently disagree: the spontaneity and ambiance would have been lost.
I’d feel differently if I was trying to produce a formal portrait — but I wasn’t.
—Peter.
Warning: This has nothing to do with photography, but I love good ideas.
The nascent smart watch industry has just been turned upside down by a 20 year old from Montreal. In Simon Tian‘s world, the watch is the central hub, and the “pocket screen” is just a blank interface.
I don’t know how well his smart watch will work, but I believe he has conceptually bested the likes of Google and Apple.
Check out the Neptune Duo.
—Peter.
Thinking out-loud/on-line, and sharing one of my edits.
Generally speaking, I dislike making digital look like film. If that was my goal, I’d just shoot film.
However, in light of the comment(s) that followed the first version of this image, I’m curious to know how this version is received. In addition to not-so-subtly adding grain, I subtly played with the contrast (both local and global). The end result is less perfect, but possibly more aesthetically pleasing.
You tell me.
—Peter.