↑Leica M9 and Leica 24mm Summilux @ f/1.4.
Inspiration
Announcement: All November profits at SBG to go to Philippines relief.
Inspiration, Q&AThe Stephen Bartels Gallery, will be donating all of its profits from print sales in November to aid individuals devastated by the recent massive storm in the Philippines.
And, if anybody purchases one of my prints at SBG, I’ll donate all of my proceeds too.
—Peter.
–
___
UPDATE: We are getting some sales:
Remember: 100% of the profit will be donated to the relief fund.
Thank you,
—Peter.
3 more Prosophos images at SBG.
Inspiration, Print, Q&AStephen Bartels, of the Stephen Bartels Gallery, informed me yesterday that three more of my images are on display at the SBG.
—Peter.
Flapping.
Inspiration, Leica 28mm Elmarit ASPH f/2.8, Print, StreetFace painting.
Inspiration, Leica 50mm Noctilux f/0.95, PortraitStories in the Shadows.
Inspiration, Leica 35mm Summarit f/2.5, PortraitBirthday Giggles.
2013, Favourite, Inspiration, Leica 50mm Summilux ASPH f/1.4, PortraitGuest Post: M240, M9 sample images.
Guest Post, Inspiration, Leica M Type 240, Q&A, Teaching pointA reader, Marc H., has provided the sample images below.
[Please note: This is not a scientifically rigorous comparison. Marc has generously provided these for your benefit. Any disrespectful comments will automatically be deleted.]
Marc writes:
“While I still had both bodies (M9 and M240), I took a walk around Frankfurt and shot random stuff, just to see how they both render and how the color translates. I set both to the same ISO values, f stop, white balance is auto. The pics themselves are nothing special, but interesting to see how they render. Both used 50mm asph lenses. “
Here are Marc’s samples
(please click on the image to view at MAXIMUM size)
Comparison 1:
–
Comparison 2:
–
Thank you Marc, for providing these.
—Peter.
Slice of Life.
Film, Inspiration, PortraitUnscientific (M240 vs. M9).
Inspiration, Leica 35mm Summicron ASPH f/2, Leica M Type 240, Portrait, Q&A, Teaching point, Voigtländer 40mm f/1.4 NoktonPlease don’t write to me and tell me this comparison is not scientifically valid — I’ve named this post Unscientific for a reason.
I will, however, acknowledge that the M240 was at a significant ISO disadvantage vs. the M9.
However, low light shooting is the main reason I bought the M240.
Perhaps those with better post-processing skills could have done better with the M240 file.
Despite my best efforts, I couldn’t.
—Peter.
About the M240… the image quality is a step down.
Inspiration, Q&A, Teaching pointYes, the image quality of the Leica M (type 240) is a step down from the Leica M9.
You have to ask yourself, why did I buy it in the first place, given all my rants about CCD vs. CMOS (and how I prefer the former)?
If you haven’t already done so, please consider signing my open letter to Leica.
___
Related posts:
Big Game Hunting.
Inspiration, Leica 35mm Summicron ASPH f/2, Leica M Type 240, Portrait, StreetWarning sign.
Film, Inspiration, Leica M3, Portrait, Zeiss ZM 21mm f/2.8 T* BiogonThe colour transfusion.
Inspiration, Leica 50mm Summilux ASPH f/1.4, Leica M Type 240, Print, Teaching pointThey were found together on the pavement, on a rainy afternoon.
On a technical note, this particular shade of red reminds me very much of the native output of the M8; it apparently can be coaxed out of the M240 after some post-processing.
And on another note, this image marks the return for me of the Leica 50mm Summilux ASPH.
—Peter.
↑Leica M240 and Leica 50mm Summilux ASPH @ f/1.4.




















