I decided to create this composite image using photos I’ve taken over the past year.
As you can see, the first (from last year) was created with the Nikon D850 + 105mm f/1.4. The other two (from this year) were created with the Fuji GFX 50R + 110mm f/2.
I share the above information purely for your interest and not for the purpose of making comparisons, as there are simply too many variables in effect in each image (for example, subject’s natural skin tone, time of day, natural vs. artificial vs. mixed lighting, etc.).
Suffice it to say, both systems produce wonderful image quality, though I would give the edge to Fuji (you cannot, however, discern that from the small-sized images I’ve posted).
With respect to weight, the Fuji also has a slight advantage:
- Nikon D850 (1, 055 g) + 105/1.4 (985 g) = 2, 040 g.
- Fuji GFX 50R (775 g) + 110/2 (1010 g) = 1, 785 g.
However, the Nikon is without a doubt the more versatile system.
—Peter.
Prosophos 
That is the dilemma I suppose, feel good satisfaction of Leica M, versatility of Nikon and image quality of Fuji. Hmmm shoot film. There is a blog called (streetsilhouettes.com) one of his latest posts compares 5 latest digital sensors vs four color films very interesting.
Getting off cameras though all portraits are very good.
Can’t deny the beauty and power of film. At any moment’s notice, I could go back.
Thank you Ian.