↑CMOS Sensor used in the D600 (image courtesy of Nikon).

–

__________________________

On September 15th, I posted some thoughts on the M9 and its CCD sensor, essentially reasserting my long-held preference for CCD (vs. CMOS) rendering, at base ISO.  Two days later, Leica introduced the M and M-E.

The new “M” — to refresh your memory — carries a CMOS sensor.

Now, in my Leica M and M-E post, I reiterated my concerns about CMOS (vs. CCD) rendering, though I decided to “wait to see” before concluding anything.

Last night, I happened to be perusing a popular photo-blogger’s site, in which he praises Nikon’s new D600 (yes, a CMOS-based camera) and reports “unbeaten” image quality.  Accompanying his post is a sample image taken at high ISO, which is simply — how can I put this delicately — atrocious.  More precisely, when you click into the higher resolution file, you are greeted by a muddy and flat arrangement of pixels devoid of detail or microcontrast.

Thinking that the poor image quality is likely secondary to shooting at high ISO (even CMOS sensor-based cameras can’t produce miracles), or the harsh lighting from the on-board flash that was used, or the previous generation zoom lens that was used, or a combination of all of these factors, I shrug it off.

Then I click into his review of the D600 and view the images taken at base ISO, with Nikon’s newest generation zoom lenses and primes (admittedly, Nikon’s newest lenses are not quite as highly regarded as Leica’s, but they’re pretty darn close).  Although the additional images look appreciably better, they still fall short of what I’m currently getting out of my three year old M9.

So, the point of all this?

I fear that if Nikon — with all its experience and might — cannot coax better image quality out of their newest generation CMOS cameras, the new “M” may end up representing a step backwards for Leica (with respect to image quality at base ISO).

I really do hope I’m wrong, but once again, I’ll wait and see…

—Peter.

_

As any Leicaphile already knows, today Leica introduced TWO new models:

The Leica M and the Leica M-E.

As expected, the new flagship M sports a 24 MP CMOS sensor and is therefore able to offer video, live view, focus peaking, and has a higher (than M9) ISO upper level (though at ISO 6400, it’s not as high as one would have expected).   The purportedly faster Leica Maestro image processor is a welcome addition, as is the new splash-proof camera body and higher resolution LCD screen.

Leica has obviously been listening to its customers (at least, to those customers who wanted these features).

The M-E, with its 18 MP CCD sensor, is — essentially — a re-jigged M9.  This is not a bad thing, as it means that Leica is still listening to the remainder of its customers — those who are more traditional with respect to their camera needs (if you can call digital camera photographers traditionalists!), who want to keep things as they are, more or less.  It also minimizes on development costs since many of the core components are being borrowed from the M9.  Shrewd move.

Back to the new flagship M:  I still have my concerns about CMOS (vs. CCD) sensor rendering.  But, the proof — as they say — is in the pudding… so I’ll wait to see some real-world images before I conclude anything.  The sample images on Leica’s website are inconclusive.

Now, here’s the main reason I decided to create this post of, essentially, re-hashed news:

No matter what you think about Leica’s new M products, you have to give Leica credit for (finally) trying to tap into the various customer segments… the pricing spread between the new cameras in their line-up (don’t forget the DLUX and X bodies) makes it possible for them to sell more gear, which bodes well for the future of the company.

That’s just Business 101.

—Peter.

[Note: I don’t accept advertising on this site.  This is therefore a personal endorsement, and not a paid advertisement.]

_

–

Popflash is a California-based authorized dealer of camera equipment that is owned and operated by Tony Rose.  I have dealt with Tony for many years now for most of my photographic purchases and felt compelled to write about his business.

Why?

Simply put, the service at Popflash is unparalleled.   Whether it’s responding to questions or requests via e-mail or over the telephone, the Popflash team is unfailingly friendly, knowledgeable, and efficient.  In particular, I’d like to recognize a specific member of the Popflash team, Alex, who is responsible for the day-to-day fielding of questions and orders.

And, despite the great service, which normally comes at a price premium in most businesses, the prices at Popflash are very competitive.  In fact, I’ve gotten some of my best deals on Leica equipment there.

Last week, for example, I was informed that Popflash was expecting delivery of a lens I had been seeking for some time.  This particular lens has been in high demand and in short supply, so I promptly placed an order for it.

Sometime later, well after placing the order, Popflash sent me an email informing me they were in a position to offer a discount on the lens and that they would be applying that discount to my order.

Can you believe it?  They could have easily sold this very popular lens at the retail price but they chose instead to pass on their own savings to a customer.

Knowing them, I can’t say I’m surprised, though I’m always impressed.

Give Popflash a try, they deserve your business.

—Peter.

It is rumoured that the M10 [Edit: M (Type 240)] will be announced by Leica on Monday.

Supposedly, it will sport a CMOS sensor, which will allow for high ISO and video capabilities.  If true, I’m sure it’ll be a hit.

However, I can’t help but feel a little sad about the demise of the CCD sensor, and its unique rendering.  To this day, I believe digital images captured at base ISO with CCD sensors look different — and more appealing — than images from CMOS sensors.

It’s only my opinion of course.

If CMOS is part of Leica’s future, then I’m sure the venerable German company will have figured out a way to retain the fabled “Leica look”.  But I’m equally sure that the rendering of an M10 [Edit: M (Type 240)] with CMOS will be different from the M9/M8 CCD experience.

Whether better or worse is open to debate, but it will be different.

So — if you’re like me and you value the look of CCD images — you better grab one of those heavily discounted brand new M9 cameras, while you still can.

—Peter.

I rarely comment about camera equipment, other than when I post one of my Lens Reports.  But, I sometimes make an exception.

Interestingly, the last time I made an exception was for another Sony product (see The Sony NEX-7 — I’ll take a pass for now)… probably because, when it comes to cameras, Sony is doing a great job pushing the proverbial envelop.  The major shortcoming of the NEX-7, for somebody like me with legacy lenses, was the cropped sensor.  As I wrote back then:

The first manufacturer, other than Leica, who places a 24 x 36 sensor in a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera can count me in as a customer.  I have no doubt that at some point, somebody will do it.

Well, what a difference a year makes.  The “buzz” this morning is all about the Sony DSC-RX1.

What’s so special about it?

It boasts a new, cutting edge, full frame 24 MP sensor packed into a body not much larger than a large compact.

Simply put:  Wow.

And, it sports a fixed (i.e. not interchangeable) Carl Zeiss Sonnar 35mm f/2 lens (think: Fuji X100, but with a full frame sensor).

So, they’re getting closer to the “ideal”.  The only thing missing is the “interchangeable lens” part of the equation.

However, it cannot be denied that this camera is revolutionary.  The image quality-to-camera size ratio bests any current digital camera.  As a feat of engineering, the RX1 deserves all the credit it can get.  And, if your preferred focal length is 35mm, it may very well be the only camera you’ll ever need.  To be honest, it may very well be the only camera most of us will every need.

Already, however, people are complaining about the price, lack of a built-in optical viewfinder, the lack of weather sealing (think: M9 ;)), etc.  But for those of us who already own lenses, this camera brings us one significant step closer to the ideal mirrorless camera.

(Did I previously write to ignore Photokina?… oh, well ;)).

And, besides, the incredibly diminutive size of this camera was likely accomplished precisely because the lens is fixed.  Moreover, if the X100 is any indication, having an optimized — designed from-the-ground-up — sensor-lens combination seems to ultimately benefit image quality.

So congratulations Sony.  I hope you folks sell a lot of these.

My only other requirement (or, at least, preference) of any interchangeable full frame mirrorless camera, which I never stated in my original NEX-7 post, is that it should function like camera and not a computer.  As a photographic tool, it must get out of the way and I shouldn’t have to dive into menus to make changes to the shutter speed, aperture, etc.  It’s the one thing Leica has understood all along… I hope this continues.

I really don’t know enough about the RX1 to comment about whether it, too, excels in ergonomics.  Unfortunately, Sony has a history of building cameras that, well, don’t operate like cameras.

But I do know enough about the RX1 to give Sony full credit for starting a revolution.

—Peter.