Leica T.

↑Photo courtesy Leica.

No, I wasn’t given the newly-released Leica T Type 701 to review. And no, I haven’t tried it.

But I’m getting emails asking me about it, so I’ll make a few comments.

The sensor is excellent (they’re using a tried-and-tested sensor), and the new lenses (only two have been announced so far) will perform in the typical Leica fashion — wonderfully. And, of course, they released an M adapter for M lenses. Nice.

I’m too biased towards optical viewfinders and larger sensors to be tempted by it.

However, I’m quite impressed with Leica‘s execution on this release. They got the marketing right, and the design (minimalistic — read: excellent). They even got the right reviewers on board, and were careful to educate them on the product beforehand.

Most impressively, they out-Appled Apple with the interface.

I like what they’ve done.

—Peter.

Eyes – Test Shot Portrait (Mamiya Tilt/Shift).

2014, Favourite, Film, Inspiration, Kodak Tri-X 400, Mamiya RZ 180mm F/4.5 Short Barrel, Mamiya RZ67 Professional Pro II, Mamiya Tilt/Shift Adapter, Portrait, Q&A, Scanner - Plustek 120, Teaching point

My first portrait using the Mamiya 180mm f/4.5 Short Barrel lens with the Mamiya Tilt/Shift Adapter.

I really should be supporting this heavy and unwieldy gear with a tripod, but I’ve avoided tripods all my life (ahhh the undisciplined life of a candid photographer).

Not bad though. I see great potential with this set-up.

—Peter.

Springtime in Toronto, Part 2.

Film, Inspiration, Kodak Tri-X 400, Mamiya RZ 110mm F/2.8, Mamiya RZ67 Professional Pro II, Portrait, Q&A, Scanner - Plustek 120, Teaching point

You have to love this city and its weather 😉 .

This image was taken using the Mamiya 110/2.8 at its near focus limit; even at f/4 (the aperture used for this shot), the depth of field is quite thin — perhaps too thin for this portrait, since only the near eye is in focus.

Still, I like it.

The look of the Tri-X film and the bigger 6 x 7 “sensor” of medium format is quite remarkable. Notice the true-to-life rendering of his face, texture of his hat, etc. Currently, high-end 35mm digital cameras may be able to out-resolve this antiquated gear (at least using the scanner I’m using), but they cannot duplicate the look of this image.

—Peter.

Photographs by Peter.com on Social Media.

Q&A

If you scroll down to the bottom of the page, you can click to follow me on Twitter and also “Like” me on Facebook (new!).

…and I barely know what any of that means. Hey, I’m busy trying to create images 🙂

Thanks,

—Peter.

My film photos featured on SteveHuffPhoto.com

Film, Inspiration, Q&A

Some of my film images were featured last Friday on Steve Huff Photo.com.

Thank you Steve Huff, for publishing them.

—Peter.

Giving Leica Credit.

Inspiration, Q&A, Teaching point

Last week’s experience with new gear made me appreciate something all over again: the joy of shooting with a rangefinder.

I’ve written about this previously, but it doesn’t hurt to be taught old lessons again.

Many people view the Leica rangefinder and its mechanical coincident focusing mechanism as antiquated. Yet, I’ve chosen this type of camera (starting with the M8) for almost 100% of my photography for the last 7 years. For me, and many others, there is no better example of an unobtrusive and high quality image-capable camera.

Recently, another camera company has been celebrated for manufacturing smaller-than-DSLR “full frame” bodies, yet it is noteworthy that Leica accomplished this back 2009 with the M9. Moreover, to this day, Leica is the only company that (mostly) understands the ergonomics of a proper camera and the importance of an optical viewfinder.

The modern Leica M camera carries forward design principles that have been retained, honed, and perfected over many decades. Quite literally, there is no competition in the current camera landscape.

On a final note…

Although I have been famously critical of a sensor decision Leica made with the M240 (though I’m learning to live with it), I have no problem giving credit where credit is due, so:

Thank you Leica, for the M.

—Peter.

Portrait.

Inspiration, Leica M Type 240, Portrait, Q&A, Teaching point, Voigtländer 40mm f/1.4 Nokton

This is an image, of course, but it’s also a test shot. I’m trying to tackle and tame the shortcomings of the CMOS sensor.

My brief experience with the D800E confirmed for me that “CMOS is CMOS” when it comes to trying to pull out shadow detail (or getting micro-contrast, or getting good skin tones)… i.e., as of April 2014, it’s not as good as CCD, whether we’re talking Nikon or Leica.

Surprisingly, the D800E also made me appreciate the M240 more.

However, going forward I’m going to give the technical stuff a rest and start concentrating on photography again.

And as I go along I hopefully will be able to reduce the time it took to get this image to where I wanted it to be.

—Peter.

↑Leica M240 and Voigtländer Nokton 40mm @ f/1.4.

Nikon D800E and Zeiss Otus 55/1.4…

Nikon D800E, Q&A, Zeiss Otus 55mm f/1.4 APO-Distagon (ZF.2 Nikon mount)

Gone.

—Peter.

Before the grains of sand.

Film, Inspiration, Leica 50mm Summilux ASPH f/1.4, Life's Little Moments, Portrait, Q&A

The title is both figurative and literal, because I previously posted an image entitled Grains of Sand.

On the very same roll of Tri-X was this frame, taken moments earlier. I normally choose a favourite image to post, and when I developed the roll, I chose the more dynamic photograph.

Now — almost two years later — I wonder whether I prefer this more contemplative one.

—Peter.

↑Leica M3, Kodak Tri-X 400, and Leica 50mm Summilux ASPH @ f/1.4.

Light Reading, Part 2 (different processing, different image).

Inspiration, Nikon D800E, Portrait, Q&A, Teaching point, Zeiss Otus 55mm f/1.4 APO-Distagon (ZF.2 Nikon mount)

Here’s a second image, taken a little earlier from the first (and cropped).

The lighting is different, and I’ve processed it differently too.

I realize I’m comparing apples to oranges, but I’m curious on your thoughts as I work through these D800E/Otus files.

—Peter.

↑Nikon D800E and Zeiss Otus 55mm @ f/1.4.

Glenfiddich Window Portrait (Tilt-Shift test shot).

Film, Fujifilm FP-3000B, Inspiration, Mamiya RZ 180mm F/4.5, Mamiya RZ67 Professional Pro II, Mamiya Tilt/Shift Adapter, Portrait, Print, Q&A, Teaching point

This is a test shot using my recently acquired used Mamiya tilt/shift accessory on Fuji instant (“Polaroid”) film.

No alcohol was harmed during the testing process.

↑Mamiya RZ67, Mamiya 180mm @ f/4.5, tilt/shift accessory, and Fuji FB-3000.

One more thing… for the Mamiya RZ67.

Inspiration, Mamiya RZ 180mm F/4.5, Mamiya RZ67 Professional Pro II, Mamiya Tilt/Shift Adapter, Nikon D800E, Q&A, Teaching point, Zeiss Otus 55mm f/1.4 APO-Distagon (ZF.2 Nikon mount)

Ever since I acquired the Mamiya RZ67, I have been searching for a specific accessory item for it.

The trouble is, it is difficult to find a used example of this piece. And brand new, it sells for more than what I paid for my entire (used) Mamiya kit.

However, last week I found a mint copy of what I was looking for, at an exceptionally low price. I thought it was too good to be true, until it arrived this week.

–

Pop Quiz: Can you identify the accessory in the image below?

–

(the above image was taken with my new digital set-up: the Nikon D800E and Zeiss Otus 55mm @ f/1.4)

My new gear – Nikon D800E and Zeiss Otus 55mm f/1.4 APO-Distagon.

Inspiration, Nikon D800E, Q&A, Teaching point, Zeiss Otus 55mm f/1.4 APO-Distagon (ZF.2 Nikon mount)

–

I am amazed at how many of you correctly deduced either the lens or camera, based on the two “test images” I posted over the last 24 hours. A few of you even employed a psychological analysis of me to come up with your answer.

The first person to correctly guess both camera and lens, even before the first test shot, was Johannes. Impressive predictive prowess, my friend.

Honourable mention goes to Andrew, who correctly guessed the lens and steadfastly held on to his prediction.

So here I go… on to a new adventure.

Please be patient with the images. The M9 + 50 Summilux ASPH pairing produces a different look, there is no doubt. In many ways I prefer its rendering to my new gear (the M9 has a CCD sensor that is superior — at base ISO — to any of the current CMOS offerings, and Leica lenses are of course legendary).

Yet, I’m back to Nikon, where my digital experience was first forged.

In a sense, I’m home again.

—Peter.

Test Shot 2.

Inspiration, Q&A, Teaching point, Undisclosed Camera

Orchids in the evening.

Considering the camera was handheld at a shutter speed of only 1/125 sec, the sharpness is excellent. The shutter vibration is better than what I expected. I’m pleasantly surprised.

The lighting was mixed (natural twilight and nearby incandescent) and the colour is true to what I saw.

Tonality is really nice too.

–

Aperture: Undisclosed

Shutter Speed: 1/125 sec

ISO: 400

Camera: Undisclosed

Lens: Undisclosed

Test Shot (with 100% crop).

Inspiration, Q&A, Teaching point, Undisclosed Camera

As promised, here is the 100% crop from the image posted earlier today:

–

Aperture: Undisclosed

Shutter Speed: 1/200 sec

ISO: 500

Camera: Undisclosed

Lens: Undisclosed

Transition Period.

Inspiration, Q&A, Teaching point

For the first time in five years, I am without a digital Leica M (my Leica M9 is gone, and so are my Leica lenses).

I don’t see myself purchasing another digital Leica M again, unless:

–

The sensor is state of the art. Leica seems intent on never going back to CCD (despite my best efforts), but the CMOS sensor in the M240 was a disappointment. There are better CMOS sensors out there.
Leica regains its focus on still image photography. With the M240 and its already-obsolete-at-launch EVF, they produced a product with “me too” add-on gimmickry at a premium price. Thank goodness they weren’t silly enough to drop the rangefinder focusing mechanism, or else all would have been lost.
Leica improves its quality control, and the reliability of its products.

The Leica M3 and Voigtländer Nokton 40mm are still with me.

The Mamiya RZ67 is with me.

My deep connection to rangefinders will remain with my M3, and I will continue to develop my portrait photography with the formidable RZ67. Both of these are, of course, film cameras.

I’ll therefore be exploring another digital system.

In fact, it’s already in my hands.

—Peter.

The Ship of Theseus, and my Leica M3.

Film, Inspiration, Leica M3, Life's Little Moments, Q&A, Teaching point

–

In Greek mythology, Theseus was the the hero who slayed the Minotaur in the Labyrinth of Knossos.

He then sailed home, on a ship that — having long been in service — was in obvious need of repair. Wooden planks were therefore removed and replaced.

Theseus’ Paradox arises from the following thought experiment: suppose, over time, more and more aging planks were removed and then replaced with new pieces of wood until — eventually — no original plank remained.

–

Would the ship still be the same ship?

–

Most people would still consider it Theseus‘ ship, but… Would it still be the same ship that served him so well?

There are several potential answers to this question, and one further wrinkle that involves taking all of the old discarded planks and re-fashioning another ship, thus creating two Theseus ships (the one with all of the replaced parts, and a new-old one with the old parts). It’s very mind-bending.

So…what’s this have to do with photography?

Nothing. But…

I recently purchased a 1963 Leica M3 in completely original condition, and sent it in for servicing. Even though it was working well enough in most situations, several of its optical and mechanical parts were in poor condition and needed to be replaced. The exterior covering was replaced too.

I’m currently waiting for its return.

While I’m waiting, the question I keep asking myself, after all of these changes is:

Is this the same M3 that allowed me take this image?

Or has my ship sailed?

—Peter.

–

Top 5 Images that I liked – but you didn’t :)

Favourite, Inspiration, Q&A, Teaching point

When you create things (like photographs) you become emotionally attached to them. Consequently, you are often not in the best position to judge whether your creations are any good.

Having said that, I’m normally pretty accurate at predicting which of my images will be favourably received.

However, I still get fooled. Sometimes, what I thought was good, you think is, well…

Here are 5 images I posted over the last few years that received minimal or no comments. They were figuratively sucked into a vacuum and left for dead.

I realize that perhaps you may have been away when I first posted them. Or, perhaps you were too pressed for time, and couldn’t leave a friendly comment.

But I am instead going to assume that you disliked these images.

How could you? 🙂

–

Top 5 Images that I liked — but you didn’t.

–

1. Bajan Tapestry.

This was photographed last month, so I admit I may be biased by the recency of my creation. Yet, I believe this may be one of the best images I’ve ever created.