Thanks Sean… I was wondering if anybody else would find it interesting.
Nice.
… “day”?
Have you gone back to Leica? Lots of separation, looks faster than 1.4?
Hello Daryls.
Your last images look so goooood!..so organic! It is a great joy to watch! 🙂
I’m glad you feel that way Andreas. I know you are usually very perceptive about these things.
I love this. A lot. Your judgement on exposure is once again perfect. Well, it always is. 😛
Some would be tempted to raise exposure by, say, 2/3 so that the subject is ‘properly’ exposed. But here we see a useful principle in action: if a subject is backlit, you can allow some – or a lot of – underexposure. But here, even if she wasn’t backlit, the chosen exposure would still work. Context!
Thanks Karim. Re: exposure, I try to depict the natural ambiance, so it feels “real”.
Prosophos 
Spot on geometry, Peter
Thanks Sean… I was wondering if anybody else would find it interesting.
Nice.
… “day”?
Have you gone back to Leica? Lots of separation, looks faster than 1.4?
Hello Daryls.
Your last images look so goooood!..so organic! It is a great joy to watch! 🙂
I’m glad you feel that way Andreas. I know you are usually very perceptive about these things.
I love this. A lot. Your judgement on exposure is once again perfect. Well, it always is. 😛
Some would be tempted to raise exposure by, say, 2/3 so that the subject is ‘properly’ exposed. But here we see a useful principle in action: if a subject is backlit, you can allow some – or a lot of – underexposure. But here, even if she wasn’t backlit, the chosen exposure would still work. Context!
Thanks Karim. Re: exposure, I try to depict the natural ambiance, so it feels “real”.