The alchemy of innocence, silver halide, and gentle light.
(please click on the image to view)
↑Leica M2, Kodak Tri-X 400, and Leica 75mm Summilux @ f/1.4.
The alchemy of innocence, silver halide, and gentle light.
(please click on the image to view)
↑Leica M2, Kodak Tri-X 400, and Leica 75mm Summilux @ f/1.4.
Michael Snow’s sculptures, inside the Eaton Centre, Toronto.
(please click on the image to view)
↑Leica M2, Kodak Tri-X 400, and Voigtländer Nokton 40mm @ f/1.4
This self-portrait represents my second lapse in judgment.
As an aside, I was experimenting here with achieving focus with the 75 ‘lux @ f/1.4 mounted on the M2. Ultimately, it’s no different than on the M9… you need to be equally careful in both situations, but it’s definitely doable. Focus here was on my eye.
This was the first frame of a 36 roll of Tri-X.
(please click on the image to view)
↑Leica M2, Kodak Tri-X 400, Leica 75mm Summilux @ f/1.4.
I thought this would be most appropriate for a Monday morning post, but it was pushed aside with all of the announcements yesterday.
Tuesday morning will do nicely however :).
As an aside, I really like the little iPhone Pocket Light Meter app – I’ve been using it for just over a year with my M2 for situations like this, where the lighting is tricky, and it’s done very well.
(please click on the image to view)
↑Leica M2, Kodak Tri-X 400, and Voigtländer Nokton 40mm @ f/1.4
I have been trying to photographically capture the essence of Honey, since she entered our lives in December. The closest I’ve come with my M9 (digital camera) is with this shot, taken 3 months ago.
The image below represents my latest attempt.
Now,
…it may be because this time I was using a more than 50 yr old camera with no back LCD screen, no meter, no battery, not even an on/off switch…
…it may be because I then fumbled with the film in a changing bag, trying to blindly load it into a spool…
… it may be because it was then lovingly bathed in a series of mystery chemicals and finally in distilled water, before being hung in my basement-turned-sauna as the hot water ran in the sink, generating steam to get rid of dust in the air…
…it may be because I then delicately handled each strip and spent minutes scanning each frame into my computer…
…it may be because all of these things make me better appreciate the act of image creation…
…but…
…I believe this image has come close to capturing Honey’s soul.
If you don’t see it, that’s OK. I can’t explain it.
But if you do see it, then you know:
—Peter.
(please click on the image to view)
↑Leica M2, Kodak Tri-X 400, and Leica 75mm Summilux @ f/1.4.
[I received this message from Lucy today and thought it was worth publishing her questions and my responses. Please feel free to contribute an opinion, if you have something constructive to say…]
_
Hello Peter.
_
I enjoy your blog very much. Capturing precious moments with the camera is why I enjoy photography and so I do appreciate the photos you take. I feel guilty to ask about gear, I know this should not matter but you use lenses I am interested in and my decisions at the moment are about selling my M9 and investing in film and a scanner (and a lot of learning time) or going with another Leica lens and staying digital._
I have spent and lost a bit of money with leica lenses and my next choice is hopefully going to be a better one than others I have made._
I just sold my Summilux 50 asph and have now just have the M9 and 50 pre asph. It is ok but the focus is very stiff and I want to sell it and When I have sold it I can afford another lens, a 35mm will be be the most useful fov and it will have to be my only lens. I found the 50 asph a little boring and I wonder how do you compare the 35 Lux fle with the 50 asph?..I think if the 35 if more interesting in it’s rendering I may just settle with the M9/35 combo and forget about setting up in film..My film camera choice is a Rolleiflex TLR, also of course a scanner and the learning curve of all that ..which could prove to be wonderful.Sorry to prattle on, I admire your work and would value your opinion on the lens very much.
Many thanks
Lucy
–
Hello Lucy,
Thank you so much for your message and for your kind words – I’m so glad you identify with the “precious” moments depicted in my work, as it’s what I strive to capture and convey.
So many questions you’ve asked! I’ll do my best to answer them, but I also invite any readers of this site to offer you an opinion too, as it’s always more fruitful to harness the knowledge of a community vs. a lone voice.
My chief piece of advice would be to “follow your heart”. Seriously.
Anything else I write is just my personal view and it does not necessarily mean it will mesh with your current development or growth as an artist and photographer. Intuitively, you probably already know what the answer is for you, but you also seem to be in need of a little direction because you’re contemplating very different paths.
Whether to opt for film or not is a very personal choice. If you’re a methodical photographer who appreciates the “craft” of working with, processing, and scanning film, then by all means, go for the medium format Rolleiflex. With that sort of a set-up you should be able to produce stunning results. Weighed against this is the mounting difficulty in procuring and working with film… it really does seem to be disappearing from the public spotlight as a photographic medium, although I believe it will always be around in some form or other.
If you choose to stay with your M9, I’m not sure the stiff focus on your pre-asph 50 Summilux is reason enough to sell it, because that can be repaired. But, further down in your message, you mention you’d rather go with a 35 FOV in which case selling the pre-asph 50 makes sense.
Finally, as for the rendering of the 35 Summilux ASPH FLE vs. the 50 Summilux ASPH, I too have gone on record as stating the 50 Summilux ASPH is an almost too “perfect” and extremely boring lens. I can write forever about this, but you seem to have reached the same conclusion so I won’t “preach to the choir”, so to speak. I will write that I’m currently using one and trying to like it. Occasionally, it astounds me with what it produces, so it’s not like I’m incapable of appreciating it.
The 35 Summilux FLE is probably the best lens – technically speaking – I’ve ever used. It produces what I would call “hyper real” results (incredible sharpness, micro-contrast, etc.) and is not as sterile in its rendering as compared to the 50 ‘lux ASPH. In a way, the 35 FLE also is too “perfect” but somehow it manages to retain more character than it’s 50 ASPH sibling.
Although you didn’t ask, the lens that I think combines the best combination of technical excellence and interesting rendering is the discontinued 75 Summilux… but the 75mm focal length is not as versatile as a 35 or 50.
I hope this helps, Lucy, and I thank you once again very much for your kind words!
—Peter | Prosophos.
And carry a big stick.
(please click on the image to view)
↑Leica M2 and Voigtländer Nokton 40mm @ f/1.4.
Communing with nature, communing with each other in Algonquin Park.
(please click on the image to view)
↑Leica M2 and Voigtländer Nokton 40/1.4.
The original Tunnel Commuting is here.
This time, I decided to use film and a different lens.
(please click on the image to view)
↑Leica M2 and Voigtländer Nokton 40mm @ f/1.4.