Connected moments of love and contemplation.
↑Leica M9 and Leica Noctilux @ f/0.95.
One more to add to my previous Halloween post.
The heavy vignette was added to lessen the surrounding household distractions.
↑Leica M9 and Leica Noctilux @ f/0.95.
Possibly the dorkiest thing I’ve ever written. My apologies to LL Cool J, and Leica.
This is meant to be rapped to the music of “Mama Said Knock You Out“.
Enjoy.
—Peter.
______________
–
[Leica]
[News Report]
[Leica]
[Chorus:]
[REPEAT 4X]
[Chorus]
[Leica]
[Chorus]
[Chorus]
This is the three year follow-up to this photo, posted yesterday.
(please click on the image to view at maximum size and sharpness)
↑Leica M9 and Leica Noctilux @ f/0.95.
_______________
Twice now I’ve written about my preference for CCD sensor rendering at base ISO, and about my concern that Leica’s switch to a CMOS sensor for the upcoming Leica M camera may represent a step backwards for image quality:
–
CMOS: that sinking feeling again.
–
The M9 has a CCD sensor, and the M8 before it had one too. In both cases, the image quality — again, at base ISO — was superior to anything being produced by CMOS-based cameras. This was true in 2006 (M8) and 2009 (M9), and it is true even today, despite the release of a new generation of CMOS cameras from Nikon, Canon, and Sony.
So here we are, very close to the release of the new Leica M, and Leica continues to be curiously quiet… no full-size sample images have been made available.
They’ve either figured out a way to do what no other manufacturer has done before (and are quietly ecstatic), or they are worried.
I’m betting they’re worried.
The new Leica M will bring many advancements and improvements over the outgoing M9, just don’t expect image quality to be one of them.
—Peter.
___________________
A good image should grab you.
If you have to read a book, or attend a class, or visit an art gallery in order to appreciate an image, then it has failed as an image.
Simple as that.
You may need to do all of the above in order to understand some images (symbolism, context, references, etc.) but that’s a different issue because, though you may not understand an image, you may still appreciate it as a form of expression.
Photography is a visual art after all.
The first — and most important — order of appreciation for any image (photo, painting, etc.) is therefore at the visual level. If it doesn’t pass that test, it’s literally not worth looking at.
—Peter.
–
[Now that my iMac is down, I’m taking the opportunity to catch up on some of my writing.]
–
Back in April, I mentioned that Getty Images, the well-known distributor of image content, was interested in about 40 of my images.
At the time, I was wondering whether I should go ahead and license my images to them. Since most of them involve people, the paperwork involved for submission was going to be a bit of a hassle.
After pondering it, and also taking into consideration some of your comments, I decided to submit just three.
After that, I kind of forgot about the whole thing.
Well, while I was away in August, I received an e-mail from Getty informing me that the rights to one of those images, Christmas at the Toronto Beach (the image above) had been purchased, and that I would be receiving a royalty payment for it some time in October.
Sure enough, the payment arrived a couple of days ago.
The amount: US$154.50.
After accessing the Getty Contributor website yesterday, I learned that this amount represents 30% of the total Getty was paid, and that my image was licensed for world-wide usage, for a duration of two years.
The intended use? Greeting cards (my guess is that you’ll see it on a Christmas card near you).
This was a bit of a learning experience for me, so I’m glad I did it. Having said that, I don’t know if I’ll be submitting any more images to Getty.
I hope that this post was of interest to those of you considering licensing your own images.
—Peter.
–
I’m currently having trouble with my almost 3 yr old iMac.
It’s faithfully helped me post-process all of the images you’ve seen on this site, both film and digital, but over the last few months it has slowed down to a crawl.
Often it just freezes, necessitating a re-start.
So, I had it checked out over the weekend and it turns out that the hard drive needs replacing. It since has been sitting in my local Apple store, and is currently in “repair” status, so I haven’t been able to process any new images. Instead, I’ve been posting my previously prepared images using another computer.
(The “spice” has to keep flowing, after all…)
As it turns out, I’m not the only one with the same problem… a few days ago, I received a message from Apple, stating:
–
–
So, if you’re having trouble with your iMac, check to see if yours is affected.
–
As an aside, along with the hard drive fix, my computer screen is also being replaced free of charge (thank you AppleCare), because it started developing some horizontal dark banding in the upper left corner.
I guess I could complain about my computer falling apart, but instead I’m pleased that Apple is standing behind its product, and its extended warranty. Thank you Apple.
And, since I intend on holding on to my Leica M9, I don’t have a pressing need to upgrade this iMac. Hopefully, when I get it back, it will give me a few more years of service.
—Peter.
_________________
–
Hi Keefe,
I often “wear” my camera, but I don’t really have a “one-a-day” project (having said that, I often post a photo every day on my site).
None of my photos are presented as they emerge out of the camera. I shoot in DNG (RAW) format which produces rather nondescript files, so it’s up to me to work with the images and shape them as I see fit.
I use Aperture with Nik plug-ins for my post-processing.
And I try to learn as I go along… continuously.
As for Leica magic? For me… yes. It’s a combination of having a camera that suits my shooting style and that is accompanied by great optics.
Thanks for writing,
—Peter.
This week, I looked back at all of my images from 2012.
As I do every year, I tried to pick out my favourites (the last time I did this, I posted my 11 from 2011).
This time, I ended up with 21 images (well, really 21 + 1 ;)).
They are not necessarily my technical best, and they are not necessarily my most popular, but they are all near and dear to my heart — mostly because they involve my family.
And they are all examples of what I like to call, Life’s Little Moments.
I hope you enjoy them.
—Peter.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
_____________________________
Please show your appreciation!
If you’ve been inspired by these images, or any of my articles, please consider making a contribution to help me run this site. Whether it’s $5, $10, or $15… it all helps.
This site is a labour of love, but any help I receive will help me devote more time to running it.
Thanks,
—Peter.