8 thoughts on “Portrait (Candid) – Test Shot #7 – Undisclosed Lens #7.”
Why do I feel like this undisclosed lens #7 isn’t a Leica?
Hi Adam, very curious to know why you think it’s not.
Sharpness, color cast, transition and fall-off.
Just doesn’t feel Leica-y
Maybe I’m wrong.
Maybe you’re not wrong.
On a related note, does “Adam” = “Asam”, or is Asam responding for Adam? (just want to know if I’m responding to the person who wrote the original comment).
Oops. Yes. Misspelled. It’s adam. I guess I have fat thumbs. Haha.
Well I’ll wait in anticipation for your big reveal on the lens. See if I’m right or way off.
Hmmm. Looks like a Leica to me. I like the soft rendering. and this image looks like it could have been taken with the 50 Lux.
Hi George, good guess. The image could have been taken with the 50mm Summilux, but was not.
Why do I feel like this undisclosed lens #7 isn’t a Leica?
Hi Adam, very curious to know why you think it’s not.
Sharpness, color cast, transition and fall-off.
Just doesn’t feel Leica-y
Maybe I’m wrong.
Maybe you’re not wrong.
On a related note, does “Adam” = “Asam”, or is Asam responding for Adam? (just want to know if I’m responding to the person who wrote the original comment).
Oops. Yes. Misspelled. It’s adam. I guess I have fat thumbs. Haha.
Well I’ll wait in anticipation for your big reveal on the lens. See if I’m right or way off.
Hmmm. Looks like a Leica to me. I like the soft rendering. and this image looks like it could have been taken with the 50 Lux.
Hi George, good guess. The image could have been taken with the 50mm Summilux, but was not.
I’ve revealed the identity of this lens: https://prosophos.com/2019/01/04/the-identity-of-undisclosed-lens-7/