The world’s longest-running CCD “Open Letter to Leica” :) continues…

I’d to like see CCD sensors in future Leica M bodies.

Why?

Because I believe CCD is superior (in tonality, micro-contrast, general je ne sai quoi vibe) to CMOS with respect to image rendition at base ISO (you know, the kind of environment in which most of us photograph).

Most of you realize this to be true.  Even those of you who initially disagreed now see there is a difference, and it favours CCD.

Am I splitting hairs in citing such nuances in sensor rendition?

Not any more so than the frequent discussions that take place around lens rendition.

Come on, you know the superior qualities of CCD befit a company like Leica!

So, if you haven’t already, please consider signing my Open Letter to Leica.

(over 270 signatures so far… )

Prosophos Open Letter to Leica

___

Related posts:

6 thoughts on “The world’s longest-running CCD “Open Letter to Leica” :) continues…

  1. sgoldswo says:

    I still don’t see a major difference between the output from the m9 and M240, but putting CCDs back into rangefinder bodies isn’t the kind of thing isn’t what I want Leica to be doing.

    Anyone who has seen the output from a Nikon D810 in EFCS mode realises that the 36MP Sony sensor unit is capable of staggering image quality. To me at least, that’s the direction Leica needs to go in, not a step back or sideways to CCD. Either Nikon or Sony tweaked the way colours were rendered in the D810 (supposedly it’s Nikon via their new expeed processor), and it has ludicrously good tonality, particularly when processed through NX-D. I would buy a rangefinder body that incorporated that sensor/ processor combination in a heartbeat.

  2. James Maier says:

    I don’t get it. Do you have any examples of the difference you’re seeing?
    I finally let go of my old M9-P after shooting it side-by-side with the M for months. Color and noise look much better to me with the new sensor.

  3. Mike Pratt says:

    I also don’t see CCD being “better” having used both cameras and a current owner of the M240. To be honest, comparing the unprocessed RAW files from each camera (with the same lens) – the differences are negligible (in my opinion of course!) although I do feel the files are cleaner with the M240. I suppose we all see different things and if you truly like CCD, great! The M9/M9P + MM are superb cameras! I’m not sure CCD will be the future of Leica though. Cheers.

  4. Gavin Pitts says:

    I have to agree with Peter on this. I owned the M240 for a few months, before going back to an M9-P. I can see a difference in skin detail and micro contrast. Don’t get me wrong, as a camera in its own right, the M240 is fantastic. It’s just if you are used to and love a certain look, then nothing else will do. And no matter what anyone says, there is a different look between CMOS and CCD sensors. Which you prefer is of course a personal choice.

  5. andygemmell says:

    I’ve drawn the conclusion that when it comes to photography technology is VERY over rated.

  6. Bin says:

    Some people can not see the difference even when it exist. It’s like music …
    But for people who can see the difference- its a hammer.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s