Gone.
—Peter.
Gone.
—Peter.
Here’s a second image, taken a little earlier from the first (and cropped).
The lighting is different, and I’ve processed it differently too.
I realize I’m comparing apples to oranges, but I’m curious on your thoughts as I work through these D800E/Otus files.
—Peter.
↑Nikon D800E and Zeiss Otus 55mm @ f/1.4.
Ever since I acquired the Mamiya RZ67, I have been searching for a specific accessory item for it.
The trouble is, it is difficult to find a used example of this piece. And brand new, it sells for more than what I paid for my entire (used) Mamiya kit.
However, last week I found a mint copy of what I was looking for, at an exceptionally low price. I thought it was too good to be true, until it arrived this week.
–
–
(the above image was taken with my new digital set-up: the Nikon D800E and Zeiss Otus 55mm @ f/1.4)
–
I am amazed at how many of you correctly deduced either the lens or camera, based on the two “test images” I posted over the last 24 hours. A few of you even employed a psychological analysis of me to come up with your answer.
The first person to correctly guess both camera and lens, even before the first test shot, was Johannes. Impressive predictive prowess, my friend.
Honourable mention goes to Andrew, who correctly guessed the lens and steadfastly held on to his prediction.
So here I go… on to a new adventure.
Please be patient with the images. The M9 + 50 Summilux ASPH pairing produces a different look, there is no doubt. In many ways I prefer its rendering to my new gear (the M9 has a CCD sensor that is superior — at base ISO — to any of the current CMOS offerings, and Leica lenses are of course legendary).
Yet, I’m back to Nikon, where my digital experience was first forged.
In a sense, I’m home again.
—Peter.