10 thoughts on “Tree Portrait, Part 2.

  1. greg g49's avatar

    I love this version: for its simplicity, positioning, use of space, and the direction of his look which gives it a bit less formal a look (which for me anyway quite suits little boys). And I suspect my B&W bias is showing through a bit.

    1. Peter | Prosophos's avatar

      Nothing wrong with a little B&W bias Greg 🙂 … although neither shot was posed, I see your point.

      By the way, in the first shot of the series (where he is smiling directly at the camera), he was actually “trash-talking” me… calling me “stinky socks”, which is his ultimate put-down.

  2. Peter's avatar

    Hi Peter. I read your film developing article at Steve Huff. It was nicely written. I wrote a question to you there: ” How do you heat the developing solution to the correct temperatures? Do they need to be exact?” Can you send me a response to: yaz1959@aol.com

    Thank you,

  3. Karim D. Ghantous (@kdghantous)'s avatar

    FWIW, I prefer the colour version. This is nice, though. But for me, it isn’t b&w unless it’s high contrast. I’m very… how should I put it… dogmatic about that. But that’s more about me than other photographeres. Other people can do nice b&w which isn’t high contrast.

Leave a reply to Kevin Ng Cancel reply