The emotional connection with the viewer would have been increased by 5% in the centre, and by 22% in the periphery.
Thanks for your question Mr. “Has-quietly-gone-through-more-gear-per-unit-time-than-even-Prosophos”… 😉
I believe that may be the longest thing I have ever been called (but certainly not the worst!)
Anyway, based on my reading, I believe your numbers are slightly off…
😀
Don’t worry, nobody is reading this.
Lol…………………….I didn’t realise the lens you were lusting after was the APO! I went looking through your photos trying to find something taken with a Summilux that I was sure you had, but got sidetracked. Now the truth is out; you’re seeking to satisfy a guilty pleasure that is otherwise known as G.A.S., that terrible affliction that gets us all at some point!!
Could I ask that you get it so that I don’t have to? I can then enjoy it vicariously, albeit with a level of jealously…..lol!
haha Gary, it’s very unlikely I will get the 50 APO. I’m okay with that (for now).
A wonderful family moment captured beautifully. I love this image.
Can I ask, have you returned to the Leica M (240)? Have I missed a post somewhere? I know you’re not a lover of the M240 but your recent images with this camera have been fantastic.
Many thanks
Thanks Mike.
As for your question, pray tell, to what are you referring?
Sorry for the confusion but in the details next to the photos it says Leica M-Peter. I assumed this was referencing a Leica M you had called Peter? I know that doesn’t make any sense but you normally state M9 or M8 or Sigma etc in your photo credits.
I know I must be seeming a bit dim here!
No Mike, you are not being dim at all. Far from it.
Have Leica given you a prototype M to play with Peter? 😉
Prosophos 
Would this have been better with an APO?
😉
M.
Possibly.
The emotional connection with the viewer would have been increased by 5% in the centre, and by 22% in the periphery.
Thanks for your question Mr. “Has-quietly-gone-through-more-gear-per-unit-time-than-even-Prosophos”… 😉
I believe that may be the longest thing I have ever been called (but certainly not the worst!)
Anyway, based on my reading, I believe your numbers are slightly off…
😀
Don’t worry, nobody is reading this.
Lol…………………….I didn’t realise the lens you were lusting after was the APO! I went looking through your photos trying to find something taken with a Summilux that I was sure you had, but got sidetracked. Now the truth is out; you’re seeking to satisfy a guilty pleasure that is otherwise known as G.A.S., that terrible affliction that gets us all at some point!!
Could I ask that you get it so that I don’t have to? I can then enjoy it vicariously, albeit with a level of jealously…..lol!
haha Gary, it’s very unlikely I will get the 50 APO. I’m okay with that (for now).
A wonderful family moment captured beautifully. I love this image.
Can I ask, have you returned to the Leica M (240)? Have I missed a post somewhere? I know you’re not a lover of the M240 but your recent images with this camera have been fantastic.
Many thanks
Thanks Mike.
As for your question, pray tell, to what are you referring?
Sorry for the confusion but in the details next to the photos it says Leica M-Peter. I assumed this was referencing a Leica M you had called Peter? I know that doesn’t make any sense but you normally state M9 or M8 or Sigma etc in your photo credits.
I know I must be seeming a bit dim here!
No Mike, you are not being dim at all. Far from it.
Have Leica given you a prototype M to play with Peter? 😉